Bibliographic record
Abstract
À une époque où l’on s’est efforcé de redéfinir la nature de la vie et de faire de l’âme (anima ou psyché) une autorité centrale dans l’organisation de tout processus matériel et immatériel, l’architecture sert non seulement de métaphore structurelle, mais aussi de schéma épistémologique capable de recadrer la formation tectonique de tout être vivant. Cet article retrace les manifestations externes et les processus méthodologiques internes de cette « âme architectonique » à travers les théories épistémologiques du philosophe Albert Lemoine et sa lecture des principes vitalistes et animistes de Georg Ernst Stahl; également dans les récits ethnographiques des forêts animées écrits par des anthropologues comparatistes tels Edward Burnett Tylor et James George Frazer; ou encore dans les rudiments du culte animiste des arbres que l’on trouve dans les écrits d’historiens et théoriciens de l’architecture tels James Fergusson, Karl Bötticher et Gottfried Semper; ou enfin dans les mémoires ethnographiques sur les rituels animistes contemporains de l’historien culturel Aby Warburg.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.027 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".