Correlation Effects in EOM-CCSD for the Excited States: Evaluated by AIM Localization Index (LI) and Delocalization Index (DI)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have extended the evaluation and interpretation of QTAIM (quantum theory of atoms in molecules) localization and delocalization indices lambda (LI) and delta (DI) to electronic excited states by studying ground states (at HF and CCSD levels) and excited states (at CIS and EOM-CCSD) of H2C=CH2, HCCH, H2C=O, H2C=S, CO2, CS2, and SO2. These molecules undergo extensive geometrical changes upon the excitation to the valence adiabatic excited singlet state. The importance of Coulomb correlation effects was demonstrated by comparing the LIs and DIs at none-correlated levels (HF and CIS) and those at correlated levels (CCSD and EOM-CCSD). In interpreting the changes in the magnitudes of the LIs and DIs, we made use of simple molecular orbital and Walsh-diagram analyses. Coulomb correlation is important in determining the magnitude of the LIs and DIs and obtaining geometries that are close to experiment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Simulation or modeling | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Methods About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Simulation or modeling | low |
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it