MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033780032 · doi:10.1061/41186(421)416

Driver Compliance Analysis of Variable Speed Limit Based Freeway Traffic Control

2011· article· en· W2033780032 on OpenAlexaffabout
Arun Bhowmick, Tony Z. Qiu, Md. Hadiuzzaman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisSimSpeed limitTransport engineeringVariable (mathematics)Limit (mathematics)Traffic simulationControl (management)Electronic speed controlComputer scienceSimulationAutomotive engineeringEngineeringMicrosimulationMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, Variable Speed Limit (VSL) has been emerged as an effective mean of traffic control strategy to improve the mobility and traffic safety. This study analyzed the effects of driver response to VSL on a freeway corridor in the City of Edmonton, Alberta, Canada using VISSIM. A previously developed modified 2nd order METANET model was adopted to implement the VSL control strategy. Various levels of speed compliance were assumed during the simulation. Finally, a simulation case study was analyzed based on the field collected data for driver's response towards posted speed limit. The study findings suggested that even with the lower speed compliance, VSL can still be effective for a traffic stream with lower speed variance. The simulation results also suggested that the adopted VSL control strategy overestimates the VSL effectiveness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTraffic Prediction and Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207