MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033787705 · doi:10.1213/ane.0b013e3182991d42

Novel Measurements of the Length of the Subglottic Airway in Infants and Young Children

2013· article· en· W2033787705 on OpenAlexaff
Metee Sirisopana, Christine Saint‐Martin, Ning Nan Wang, John J. Manoukian, Lily H. P. Nguyen, Karen A. Brown

Bibliographic record

VenueAnesthesia & Analgesia · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTracheal and airway disorders
Canadian institutionsMontreal Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAirwayCricoid cartilageConfidence intervalSagittal planeSubglottic stenosisLarynxNuclear medicinePercentileAnatomySurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: To date, the lengths of the subglottic and tracheal airway segments have been measured from autopsy specimens. Images of the head and neck obtained from computerized tomography (CT) provide an alternate method. Our objective in this study was to identify anatomic landmarks from CT scans in infants and young children to estimate the lengths of the subglottic and tracheal airway segments and to correlate these lengths with age. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of CT images of the neck for various diagnostic indications in children ≤3 years. We obtained planes of reconstruction at the level of the vocal cords (VCs), cricoid cartilage, and carina (C) which were parallel to each other and perpendicular to sagittal long axis of the trachea. The lengths of the subglottic airway (LengthSG) and total length of the laryngotracheal airway (LengthVC-C) were measured from the distance between, respectively, the VC versus cricoid cartilage and the VC versus C planes of reconstruction. Tracheal length was then calculated as the difference between LengthVC-C and LengthSG. RESULTS: Fifty-six children met the inclusion criteria. There were 29 boys. The median weight was 10.7 kg (range 3.1-19.0 kg). Regression analysis yielded mean LengthSG (mm) = 7.8 + 0.03·corrected age (months), r(2) = 0.07, P = 0.056; lower and upper 95% confidence interval for β = 0.03 were -0.001 and 0061. The mean LengthSG was 8.4 mm with an SD of 1.4 mm. The 95th percentile for LengthSG was 10.8 mm, and the 5% to 95% interquartile range was 4.9 mm. The estimate for the 95% confidence interval of the 95th percentile was between 10.2 and 11.3 mm. The LengthVC-C increased with age: mean LengthVC-C (cm) = 5.3 + 0.05·corrected age (months), r(2) = 0.7, P < 0.001. Tracheal length also increased with age: mean tracheal length (cm) = 4.5 + 0.05·corrected age (months), r(2) = 0.6, P < 0.001. CONCLUSION: We report a novel estimate method for the lengths of the airway segments between the VC and C in 56 infants and young children and suggest that the growth characteristics of the subglottic and tracheal airway may differ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.337

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnesthesia & AnalgesiaSame topicTracheal and airway disordersFrench-language works237,207