Effect of group-III donors on high-resolution photoluminescence and morphology of ZnO nanowires grown by metalorganic vapour phase epitaxy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Extremely sharp low temperature photoluminescence (PL) linewidths as low as 0.17 meV are observed in nominally undoped ZnO nanowires grown by metalorganic vapour phase epitaxy (MOVPE). These are among the narrowest lines reported for ZnO PL, even for bulk growth, despite growth on highly mismatched sapphire substrates. MOVPE allows the control of group III dopants over a wide range of doping levels. At low concentrations the addition of indium and aluminum dopant resulted in the appearance of their corresponding neutral and ionized donor bound exciton transitions with linewidths comparable to those of nominally undoped material. At higher dopant levels, the axial growth rate decreases and the lateral growth rate increases for both dopants, resulting in eventual coalescence of the nanowires as well as a strong reduction in PL efficiency. The onset of lateral growth also coincides with the elimination of the so-called Y-line defect luminescence previously attributed to excitons localized at structural defects. Because of the lack of appreciable substrate induced strain, coupled with very high crystalline quality, nanowires provide an excellent tool for investigation of shallow dopant effects in ZnO by PL spectroscopy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".