MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Pituitary Apoplexy Masquerading as Meningoencephalitis

2004· article· en· W2033822140 on OpenAlexaff
Davinder S. Jassal, Gregory J. McGinn, John M. Embil

Bibliographic record

VenueHeadache The Journal of Head and Face Pain · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPituitary apoplexyMedicineMeningoencephalitisEtiologyDifferential diagnosisMeningitisSubarachnoid hemorrhageCerebrospinal fluidPathologySurgeryPituitary adenoma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Pituitary apoplexy, a rare but life-threatening disorder, is characterized by the abrupt destruction of pituitary tissue secondary to infarction or hemorrhage of the gland itself. Its clinical features include severe headache, stiff neck, fever, visual disturbances, and symptoms of hypoadrenalism. OBJECTIVES: To assess how pituitary apoplexy may mimic the clinical findings of an infectious meningoencephalitis. METHODS AND RESULTS: We describe 3 individuals whose clinical profile and paraclinical studies were consistent with a diagnosis of presumed infectious meningoencephalitis. With minimal improvement on antimicrobial therapy, however, an extensive clinical and radiographic reevaluation yielded pituitary apoplexy as the etiology of their acute neurologic event. CONCLUSIONS: Pituitary apoplexy is often misdiagnosed as meningitis or subarachnoid hemorrhage due to the presence of leukocytes and erythrocytes in the cerebrospinal fluid. These cases serve to highlight the importance of maintaining a broad differential diagnosis when evaluating patients presenting with an acute headache.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHeadache The Journal of Head and Face PainSame topicPituitary Gland Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207