MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033834834 · doi:10.1175/2008bams2354.1

The Fog Remote Sensing and Modeling Field Project

2008· article· en· W2033834834 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the American Meteorological Society · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric aerosols and clouds
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNowcastingEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyVisibilityDropsondeRadiosondeWeather Research and Forecasting ModelPrecipitationAerosolRemote sensingGeographyTropical cyclone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A field project that includes surface observations, remote sensing, and forecast models provides a better understanding of fog-induced low visibility and improves the parameterization of fog microphysics. J l T he total economic loss associated with the impact of fog on aviation, marine, and land transportation can be comparable to those of winter storms. For example, in the pre-Christmas period of 20-23 December 2006, the British Airport Authority (BAA) reported that a blanket of fog and freezing fog over the United Kingdom (UK) forced 175,000 passengers to miss flights from its seven British airports, with Heathrow being the worst affected Early estimates suggested that this disruption to air travel cost British Airways at least 25 million The costs to stranded passengers in terms of money and inconvenience may be impossible to calculate. Previous studies have also shown that human and financial losses due to accidents related to fog episodes are very common. In Canada, approximately 50 people per year die because of motor vehicle accidents (Gultepe et al. 2007a) in which fog was a contributing factor (Transport Canada Report 2001). In describing ground transportation in Illinois, Westcott (2007) stated that approximately 4,000 accidents and 30 deaths occur annually under foggy conditions in Illinois, excluding the city of Chicago. In Europe, a major fog project called Cooperation in Field of Scientific and Technical Research (COST-722), with objectives of reducing economic loss and fatalities, was also created to develop advanced methods for very short-range forecasts of fog and low clouds m A dense fog event with low visibility values of about 50 m occurred on 27 Dec 2008. On this day, there was at snow on the ground in Toronto, Ontario, Canada when rain started at about 9:00 a.m. local time. The combina falling and snow on the ground with temperatures reaching up to I0C resulted in very dense fog in the boi

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.704
Threshold uncertainty score0.523

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it