Inhibition of membrane‐bound lytic transglycosylase B by NAG‐thiazoline
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The lytic transglycosylases cleave the bacterial cell wall heteropolymer peptidoglycan with the same specificity as the muramidases (lysozymes), between the N-acetylmuramic acid and N-acetylglucosamine residues, with the concomitant formation of a 1,6-anhydromuramoyl residue. The putative catalytic residue in the family 3 lytic transglycosylase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Glu162 as identified by sequence alignment to the homologous enzyme from Escherichia coli, was replaced with both Ala and Asp by site-directed mutagenesis. Neither mutant enzyme differed structurally from the wild-type enzyme, as judged by CD spectroscopy, but both were enzymatically inactive confirming the essential role of Glu162 in the mechanism of action of this lytic transglycosylase. The beta-hexosaminidase inhibitor NAG-thiazoline was shown to inhibit the activity of lytic transglycosylase activity, thus providing the first direct evidence that the formation of the 1,6-anhydromuramoyl residue may proceed through an oxazolinium ion intermediate involving anchimeric assistance. Using surface plasmon resonance and difference absorbance spectroscopy, Kd values of 1.8 and 1.4 mM, respectively, were determined for NAG thiazoline, while its parent compound N-acetylglucosamine neither inhibited nor appeared to bind the lytic transglycosylase with any significant affinity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".