Development of foregut and proboscis in the buccinid neogastropod <i>Nassarius mendicus</i>: Evolutionary opportunity exploited by a developmental module
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article extends previous descriptions of foregut development and metamorphosis in neogastropods by providing data on the buccinid Nassarius mendicus, a species with a feeding larva. Histological sections showed that, like many other gastropods, the postmetamorphic buccal cavity and radular sac of N. mendicus differentiate during the larval stage from a ventral outpocketing of the distal larval esophagus. However, in N. mendicus the outpocketing also gives rise to the entire anterior esophagus and valve of Leiblein, suggesting that both these structures may be evolutionary derivatives of the gastropod buccal cavity. Scanning electron microscopy and three-dimensional reconstructions of section profiles revealed that the distal larval esophagus and larval mouth are completely destroyed at metamorphosis. The postmetamorphic mouth is formed as a new orifice. Furthermore, epithelia covering the proboscis and proboscis sac arise from preexisting epidermal epithelium of the larval head, an interpretation that contradicts an earlier suggestion on the origin of these epithelial elements in neogastropods with a feeding larval stage. These results, when compared to foregut development in other gastropods, lead me to propose that the gastropod buccal cavity and buccal mass is a developmental module. Canalized development of this module may have been important to the "evolvability" of the complex gastropod foregut, because it allowed a silent developmental novelty to arise (secondary formation of the postmetamorphic mouth) without disrupting development of the whole module. Nevertheless, this silent novelty might have subsequently facilitated dramatic evolutionary change by allowing the elaborate foregut structure of predatory, postmetamorphic neogastropods to arise in late stage larvae without compromising larval feeding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".