MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033878486 · doi:10.1115/pvp2008-61091

Nonlinear Cycling Analysis of Pipe Bends With Initial Ovality

2008· article· en· W2033878486 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 1: Codes and Standards · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFatigue and fracture mechanics
Canadian institutionsOntario Power Generation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvalityShakedownPipingStructural engineeringFinite element methodBendingNonlinear systemMaterials scienceEngineeringMechanical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper presents the nonlinear shakedown analysis using finite element method for piping bends taking account of the maximum ovality tolerance. In the ASME Code, Section III NB-4223.2, it is required that the ovality tolerance of piping after bending shall be considered when the pipe structure is subjected to any combination of cyclic thermal and pressure loads. Parametric studies are carried out to assess the progressive strain accumulation induced by various finite element analyses employing different types of boundary conditions and cycling loading. The resulting strain state of the stabilized cycle for the pipe bend including the maximum ovality tolerance is compared with the strain state for the perfectly round pipe bend. This paper also discusses the choice of the global shakedown related to the global in-plane strain and the local shakedown defined as the radial strain on the side of the elbows. Furthermore, the strain range is taken as the representative parameter for fatigue calculations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.576
Threshold uncertainty score0.421

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it