MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033896120 · doi:10.1162/tneq.2007.80.4.717

<i>Blacks on the Border: The Black Refugees in British North America, 1815–1860</i>. By Harvey Amani Whitfield. (Burlington: University of Vermont Press / Hanover, N.H.: University Press of New England, 2006. Pp. xviii, 180. $65.00 cloth; $24.95 paper.)

2007· article· en· W2033896120 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ken Donovan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe New England Quarterly · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsCape Breton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIconCitationNew englandHistoryDownloadLibrary scienceMedia studiesArt historyPolitical scienceSociologyWorld Wide WebLawComputer sciencePolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

December 01 2007 Blacks on the Border: The Black Refugees in British North America, 1815–1860 Blacks on the Border: The Black Refugees in British North America, 1815–1860. By Harvey AmaniWhitfield. (Burlington: University of Vermont Press / Hanover, N.H.: University Press of New England, 2006. Pp. xviii, 180. $65.00 cloth; $24.95 paper.) Ken Donovan Ken Donovan Ken Donovan, a historian with Parks Canada, is the author of the forthcoming Slaves in Cape Breton, 1713 to 1815. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Author and Article Information Ken Donovan Ken Donovan, a historian with Parks Canada, is the author of the forthcoming Slaves in Cape Breton, 1713 to 1815. Online ISSN: 1937-2213 Print ISSN: 0028-4866 © 2007 by The New England Quarterly2007 The New England Quarterly (2007) 80 (4): 717–719. https://doi.org/10.1162/tneq.2007.80.4.717 Cite Icon Cite Permissions Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Search Site Citation Ken Donovan; Blacks on the Border: The Black Refugees in British North America, 1815–1860. The New England Quarterly 2007; 80 (4): 717–719. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/tneq.2007.80.4.717 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll JournalsThe New England Quarterly Search Advanced Search This content is only available as a PDF. © 2007 by The New England Quarterly2007 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.576
Threshold uncertainty score0.843

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0720.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe New England QuarterlySame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207