Pollen polymorphism in<i>Thymus capitatus</i>(Lamiaceae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polymorphism with respect to size and structural characteristics occurs in pollen grains of several species. Pollen grains of Thymus capitatus (L.) Hoffmans & Link. from three different areas of Greece were collected, and their palynological characteristics were measured. Using light and scanning electron microscopy, a quantification of pollen polymorphism of T. capitatus was achieved by measuring the size and the characteristics of exine sculpture. The measurements were repeated during 3 successive years, and statistical analyses with one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple range test were applied. Results revealed differences in the exine pattern between the locations; also, three palynological characteristics (surface, perimeter, and equatorial diameter) differed statistically. The results clearly indicate that pollen grains of T. capitatus are polymorphic between the sampling areas. The polymorphism has been related to environmental parameters and mainly with water availability. Average rainfall seems to be the main factor contributing to the morphological variation of pollen grains by affecting their size and exine sculpture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".