MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033937100 · doi:10.1145/2433140.2433151

A framework to compute statistics of system parameters from very large trace files

2013· article· en· W2033937100 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Management and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceGranularityTRACE (psycholinguistics)HierarchyInterval (graph theory)ArchitectureData miningTheoretical computer scienceAlgorithmOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present a framework to compute, store and retrieve statistics of various system metrics from large traces in an efficient way. The proposed framework allows for rapid interactive queries about system metrics values for any given time interval. In the proposed framework, efficient data structures and algorithms are designed to achieve a reasonable query time while utilizing less disk space. A parameter termed granularity degree (GD) is defined to determine the threshold of how often it is required to store the precomputed statistics on disk. The solution supports the hierarchy of system resources and also different granularities of time ranges. We explain the architecture of the framework and show how it can be used to efficiently compute and extract the CPU usage and other system metrics. The importance of the framework and its different applications are shown and evaluated in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.698
Threshold uncertainty score0.968

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it