Medical treatment of patients with stable angina pectoris referred for coronary angiography: Failure of treatment or failure to treat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients referred for elective coronary arteriography because of stable angina pectoris frequently do not receive appropriate medical therapy prior to arteriography. Persistence of symptoms due to lack of appropriate therapy may influence the decision to catheterize and the treatment chosen following catheterization. HYPOTHESIS: The present study evaluates whether patients with stable angina pectoris referred for cardiac catheterization received optimal therapy prior to the procedure. We also evaluated whether medical therapy was optimized as a result of the hospitalization for catheterization. METHODS: We evaluated prospectively the adequacy of medical therapy in 333 consecutive patients undergoing elective coronary arteriography. Of these, 160 had stable angina pectoris as their main problem and constituted the study group. RESULTS: Mean duration of angina was 7.5 +/- 6.3 months. Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina grade 1 was present in 20, grade 2 in 77, grade 3 or 4 in 63 patients. Arteriography showed a > or = 50% coronary stenosis in 141 of 160 patients. Aspirin was used by 96%, and 86% received at least one drug aimed at relieving anginal symptoms: beta blockers in 69%, calcium blockers in 30%, and long-acting nitrates in 29%. Antianginal drugs and drugs aimed at treating risk factors were usually taken at a low, subtherapeutic dosage. Only 35 of 110 patients taking beta blockers had a resting heart rate of <60/min. Following catheterization, 88 of 141 patients with coronary stenosis of > or = 50% underwent percutanous intervention and 5 had urgent surgery. Optimization of treatment was advised in only 7 of 48 patients for whom medical therapy or elective surgery was recommended. CONCLUSION: Patients with stable angina pectoris are frequently referred for cardiac catheterization without making a serious attempt to control their symptoms by medical therapy. Risk factors are undertreated. With proper pharmacotherapy, many patients might have become asymptomatic and have chosen not to undergo catheterization and subsequent percutaneous interventions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".