MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033937548 · doi:10.1002/clc.4960250908

Medical treatment of patients with stable angina pectoris referred for coronary angiography: Failure of treatment or failure to treat

2002· article· en· W2033937548 on OpenAlex
Shemy Carasso, Walter Markiewicz

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cardiology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnginaAspirinCardiac catheterizationCardiologyInternal medicineCanadian Cardiovascular SocietyStenosisMedical therapyHeart failureStable anginaAngiographySurgeryCoronary artery diseaseMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Patients referred for elective coronary arteriography because of stable angina pectoris frequently do not receive appropriate medical therapy prior to arteriography. Persistence of symptoms due to lack of appropriate therapy may influence the decision to catheterize and the treatment chosen following catheterization. HYPOTHESIS: The present study evaluates whether patients with stable angina pectoris referred for cardiac catheterization received optimal therapy prior to the procedure. We also evaluated whether medical therapy was optimized as a result of the hospitalization for catheterization. METHODS: We evaluated prospectively the adequacy of medical therapy in 333 consecutive patients undergoing elective coronary arteriography. Of these, 160 had stable angina pectoris as their main problem and constituted the study group. RESULTS: Mean duration of angina was 7.5 +/- 6.3 months. Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina grade 1 was present in 20, grade 2 in 77, grade 3 or 4 in 63 patients. Arteriography showed a > or = 50% coronary stenosis in 141 of 160 patients. Aspirin was used by 96%, and 86% received at least one drug aimed at relieving anginal symptoms: beta blockers in 69%, calcium blockers in 30%, and long-acting nitrates in 29%. Antianginal drugs and drugs aimed at treating risk factors were usually taken at a low, subtherapeutic dosage. Only 35 of 110 patients taking beta blockers had a resting heart rate of <60/min. Following catheterization, 88 of 141 patients with coronary stenosis of > or = 50% underwent percutanous intervention and 5 had urgent surgery. Optimization of treatment was advised in only 7 of 48 patients for whom medical therapy or elective surgery was recommended. CONCLUSION: Patients with stable angina pectoris are frequently referred for cardiac catheterization without making a serious attempt to control their symptoms by medical therapy. Risk factors are undertreated. With proper pharmacotherapy, many patients might have become asymptomatic and have chosen not to undergo catheterization and subsequent percutaneous interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.111
Threshold uncertainty score0.678

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it