MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033942303 · doi:10.3138/chr.84.2.177

Roads, Cart Tracks, and Bridle Paths: Land Transportation and the Domestic Economy of Mid-Nineteenth-Century Eastern British North America

2003· article· en· W2033942303 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Robert MacKinnon

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Historical Review · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCartGeographyEconomyHistoryArchaeologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contemporary observers of mid-nineteenth-century eastern British North America were unanimous in their condemnation of the road network. There is much anecdotal evidence about the poor quality of roads and bridges and the difficulties of overland travel. Seldom is it possible to analyze pre-railroad transportation in less subjective terms. However, a travel census commissioned in 1848 as part of an effort to ascertain the feasibility of potential intercolonial railway routes between Halifax and Quebec provides some rare data on the nature and extent of land transportation in mid-nineteenth-century Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Canada East. The focus of this article is on the movement of people and goods documented in the 1848 census. In addition to providing an overview of mid-nineteenth-century transportation and settlement patterns, it contributes to our understanding of the scale and dimensions of internal trade within each of these colonies. While intercolonial travel is shown to have been extremely limited in the pre-railway era, intracolonial travel patterns were complex. Local patterns of land transportation reveal a number of closely circumscribed market hinterlands where trade, exchange, and social interaction linked rural communities to wider colonial and international worlds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.612
Threshold uncertainty score0.389

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Historical ReviewSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207