MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033943674 · doi:10.14740/jmc.v6i4.2074

Ascending and Aortic Arch Thrombus: Cause of Myocardial Infarction and Lower Extremity Ischemia

2015· article· en· W2033943674 on OpenAlex
N. O. Okoronkwo, Frank Wang, Gabriele Di Luozzo

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAortic Thrombus and Embolism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThrombusAortic archAscending aortaCardiologyMyocardial infarctionClaudicationInternal medicineSurgeryAortaVascular diseaseArterial disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ascending aortic thrombus is a rare finding that might lead to life-threatening thromboembolic events. With no specific guidelines, controversy exists regarding management ranging from surgical resection, thrombolytic therapy, and thrombectomy to anticoagulation therapy. We report a particularly interesting case of a 61-year-old woman presenting with NSTEMI and lower extremity claudication from an embolic thrombus in the distal ascending aorta and proximal aortic arch treated medically with anticoagulation. Repeat imaging in 2 months revealed resolution of the thrombus. J Med Cases. 2015;6(4):156-158 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jmc2074w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.303

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it