MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033964596 · doi:10.1149/1.2825168

Oxygen Reduction Behavior of Highly Porous Non-Noble Metal Catalysts Prepared by a Template-Assisted Synthesis Route

2008· article· en· W2033964596 on OpenAlexafffund
Arnd Garsuch, Ryan d’Eon, Tara Dahn, Olaf Klepel, Rita R. Garsuch, Jeffrey R. Dahn

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersDalhousie University
KeywordsCatalysisMesoporous materialNoble metalMaterials scienceChemical engineeringTransition metalDissolutionScanning electron microscopeHydrochloric acidInorganic chemistryHydrofluoric acidCarbonizationMetalPorosityChemistryOrganic chemistryMetallurgyComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Highly porous non-noble metal catalysts have been prepared by template-assisted synthesis, a nanocasting procedure. A mesoporous silica gel was used to prepare different oxygen reduction catalysts. The synthesis procedure consists of the following steps: impregnation of the template with different transition metal salts ( or ), pore filling of the impregnated host material with pyrrole, polymerization of pyrrole with hydrochloric acid and subsequent carbonization in argon as well as final liberation of the catalyst material by dissolving the template framework and the transition metal in hydrofluoric acid. The obtained catalyst samples are highly porous and exhibit outstanding oxygen reduction behavior. The Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller method surface areas between 670 and and pore volumes ranging from have been observed. Onset potentials up to were recorded during the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). Different parameters affecting ORR activity (e.g., metal source, metal concentration of host material, annealing temperature) have been investigated and are discussed. Corresponding non-noble metal catalysts have been characterized by X-ray diffraction measurements, elemental analysis, scanning electron microscopy, and nitrogen adsorption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.932

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFrench-language works237,207