MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Immunohistochemical analysis of pleomorphic lobular carcinoma: higher expression of p53 and chromogranin and lower expression of ER and PgR

2000· article· en· W2033975752 on OpenAlexaff
Radhi

Bibliographic record

VenueHistopathology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBreast Lesions and Carcinomas
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanRoyal University Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCytokeratinChromogranin APathologyLobular carcinomaImmunohistochemistryCarcinomaBiologyInvasive lobular carcinomaProgesterone receptorMedicineEstrogen receptorDuctal carcinomaCancerBreast cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma of the breast is a histological variant of infiltrating lobular carcinoma with a poor prognosis. The aim of this study is to investigate the immunohistochemical profile of this distinctive breast carcinoma in comparison with the classical type. The expression of cytokeratin, epithelial membrane antigen, gross cystic disease fluid protein-15, chromogranin, oestrogen and progesterone receptors and p53 oncoprotein was investigated to examine whether the expression of these markers correlates with the aggressiveness of this variant. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sections from 10 cases of pleomorphic lobular carcinomas were reviewed and examined for the expression of cytokeratin of high and low molecular weight, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP-15), chromogranin, oestrogen (ER) and progesterone receptors (PgR), and p53 oncoprotein. Immunohistochemical staining was performed on paraffin wax embedded sections. Ten cases of classical lobular carcinomas were used for comparison. A semiquantitative count of the percentage of positive tumour cells was recorded. Pleomorphic lobular carcinomas have most of the characteristic histological features of the classical type but have nuclear anaplasia and abundant granular cytoplasm. Clinically they exhibited poor prognosis and a high frequency of nodal metastases. All of the pleomorphic lobular carcinomas expressed low and high molecular weight keratin, EMA, and GCDFP-15, eight cases expressed nuclear p53 at a range between 10% and 45%. All cases expressed chromogranin (3-5%). ER and PgR were weakly positive in two cases and negative in eight cases. Classical infiltrating lobular carcinomas were all positive for cytokeratin, EMA, ER and PgR and negative for GCDFP-15. Only five cases of classical lobular carcinoma expressed p53 positivity with up to 5% nuclear staining while chromogranin showed less expression (1-2%). CONCLUSION: Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma exhibits distinct cellular features with apocrine differentiation, higher expression of chromogranin and p53 protein and lower ER and PgR in comparison with classical lobular carcinomas. Determination of p53 overexpression and reduced or absent expression of ER and PgR may help predict the behaviour of this variant of lobular carcinoma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistopathologySame topicBreast Lesions and CarcinomasFrench-language works237,207