The progression of strong and weak hydrogen bonds in a series of ethylenediammonium dithiocyanate derivatives—a new bonding protocol for macromolecules?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The experimental charge densities for a series of sym-N-methyl-substituted ethylenediammonium dithiocyanate salts have been investigated based on low-temperature and high-resolution X-ray diffraction data. This series of organic dications provides both strong and weak hydrogen bonding networks that vary depending on the N-H : SCN(-) (donor/acceptor) ratios. The number of N-HN hydrogen bonds connected to each cation increases (linear to bifurcated) as the number of N-H donor groups increases. The bifurcated thiocyanate anions also form a less energetic N-HS hydrogen bond. The presence of more than one hydrogen bond acceptor on each thiocyanate anion results in a competition between the sulfur and nitrogen atoms in forming both strong and weak hydrogen bonds. The formation of a significant number of weak hydrogen bonds is shown to play a crucial role in stabilizing these organic ionic crystals. The progression of these organic dications (smaller to larger N-H : SCN(-) ratios) results in the weaker hydrogen bonds playing a smaller role in stabilizing the crystalline structures. In addition, the electron density along the saddle point has been shown to vary significantly from weak hydrogen bonds to van der Waals interactions. This has led to a better understanding of the progression of hydrogen bonding in the crystalline states of sym-N-methyl substituted ethylenediammonium dithiocyanate salts and provides insight into the relationship between strong and weak hydrogen bonds in organic ionic crystals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".