THE CHROMOSOME NUMBER OF MAN
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Full frame distilled prediction
Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
- Candidate categories
- Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
- Consensus categories
- none
- Domain
- Candidate signal: noneConsensus signal: none
- Study design
- Candidate signal: Bench or experimentalConsensus signal: none
- Genre
- Candidate signal: EmpiricalConsensus signal: Empirical
- Teacher disagreement score
- 0.725
- Threshold uncertainty score
- 0.998
- Validation status
machine_predicted_unvalidated·codex-gemma-dda1882f352a
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
- Teacher spread
- 0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
- Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline· verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
Abstract
Desde su aparición en 1944 la Estación Experimental de Aula Dei (EEAD) contempló objetivos de investigación básicos y aplicados, adecuando sus líneas de trabajo a las necesidades de investigación de cada momento. Gracias a una acertada política de reclutamiento de talentos, desde muy temprano se consagró como uno de los centros nacionales de referencia en la investigación agraria española, con gran impacto económico y social. \n \nEn sus primeros años de existencia, los Convenios con los EEUU y los Planes de Desarrollo Españoles financiaron logros científicos notables en el campo de la citogenética, la pomología, la fertilidad de los suelos o la mejora genética. \n \nUno de los hitos más destacables de la EEAD fue el descubrimiento del número cromosómico humano por un investigador de la EEAD (el Dr. J.H. Tjio), hecho difundido con este trabajo publicado en la revista Hereditas (Lund, Suecia). \n \n \nHereditas is available at: \nhttp://www3.interscience.wiley.com
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- Hereditas
- Topic
- Botanical Research and Chemistry
- Field
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences
- Canadian institutions
- Institute of Genetics
- Funders
- not available
- Keywords
- Cancer geneticsChromosomeGeneticsChromosome numberBiologyKaryotypeHumanitiesCancerPhilosophyGene
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes