MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033996232 · doi:10.1191/096120301667486047

Placentation, antiphospholipid syndrome and pregnancy outcome

2001· review· en· W2033996232 on OpenAlexaff
Sophia Stone, Munther A. Khamashta, Lucilla Poston

Bibliographic record

VenueLupus · 2001
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsWomen's Health Research Institute
FundersUniversity of Cambridge
KeywordsPlacentationAntiphospholipid syndromeMedicinePregnancyPathologicalDiseaseAutoantibodyAnticardiolipin antibodiesObstetricsPlacentaGynecologyImmunologyAntibodyPathologyFetusBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) are a diverse group of autoantibodies associated with a pattern of disease known as antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Pregnancy complications secondary to placental insufficiency are key features of this disease. The mechanisms underlying the placental pathology remain unclear. In this article the process of placentation in healthy and pathological pregnancies is reviewed. The evidence for defective placentation in APS pregnancies and involvement of aPLs in this process is summarized. Finally hypotheses based on the interpretation of these studies are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.717
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLupusSame topicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchFrench-language works237,207