MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Oral colonization and immune responses to<i>Streptococcus gordonii</i>expressing a pertussis toxin S1 fragment in mice

2002· article· en· W2034034784 on OpenAlexafffund
S.F. Lee, Scott A. Halperin, H. Wang, Alison Macarthur

Bibliographic record

VenueFEMS Microbiology Letters · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBacterial Infections and Vaccines
Canadian institutionsIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreDalhousie University
FundersMedical Research CouncilIWK Health Centre
KeywordsStreptococcus gordoniiImmunogenicityBiologyMicrobiologyAntibodyRecombinant DNAPertussis toxinFusion proteinVirologyImmunoglobulin AImmune systemSalivaColonizationImmunoglobulin GImmunologyReceptorStreptococcaceaeGeneG protein

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ability of a recombinant Streptococcus gordonii RJM4 expressing the N-terminal 179-amino acid fragment of S1 subunit of pertussis toxin (PT) as a SpaP/S1 fusion protein was tested for oral colonization and immunogenicity in BALB/c mice. Following two consecutive oral inoculations, 100% of the mice were colonized by the recombinant strains for up to 9 weeks and >60% of the animals still retained the strains after 19 weeks. RJM4 recovered from the animals continued to express the SpaP/S1 fusion protein indicating the stability of the fusion gene in vivo. Secretory (S) IgA antibody against PT could be detected in saliva from RJM4-colonized mice but not from the control groups of mice. SIgA against SpaP was also detected in saliva from the RJM4-inoculated and the S. gordonii SL3 (control)-inoculated mice. Serum antibodies against PT and SpaP were not detected in these animals. In conclusion, long-term oral colonization of BALB/c mice with our recombinant S. gordonii was established and the colonization elicited mucosal antibodies against PT and SpaP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.286
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEMS Microbiology LettersSame topicBacterial Infections and VaccinesFrench-language works237,207