MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034038600 · doi:10.1139/t00-041

Proposition d'une loi « hybride » modélisant l'écrouissage du sel gemme

2000· article· en· W2034038600 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M. Hamami

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRock Mechanics and Modeling
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsViscoplasticityCreepHardening (computing)Strain hardening exponentGeotechnical engineeringWork hardeningMaterials scienceTest dataGeologyStructural engineeringConstitutive equationComputer scienceEngineeringComposite materialFinite element method

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The work presented in this paper is part of a research program dealing with the thermomechanical behaviour of rock salt. It consists of studying the deferred behaviour by means of multi-step creep tests with changes in deviator and temperature. The test results have revealed the strain-hardening character of rock salt superposed to the influence of temperature and stress. The interpretation of the test results with the model designed by J. Lemaitre, is not completely satisfactory for the entire set of test results because Lemaitre's model is used for the modeling of the viscoplastic behaviour of materials with only one strain hardening variable. Hence, a "hybrid" model introducing a double variable for strain hardening has been proposed. The validation of this model on the creep tests is very satisfactory and confirms the existence of two variables of strain hardening for rock salt behaviour.Key words: rock salt, multi-step creep, strain hardening, J. Lemaitre model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicRock Mechanics and ModelingFrench-language works237,207