Microbiologia do meato médio na rinossinusite crônica
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este foi um estudo prospectivo que visou identificar a microbiologia do meato médio em pacientes com rinossinusite crônica (RSC) e compará-la com a de indivíduos sadios. MATERIAL E MÉTODOS: Foram incluídos 134 pacientes RSC e 50 voluntários sadios, que constituíram o grupo controle. As amostras foram coletadas endoscopicamente e submetidas a exames pelo método de Gram com contagem leucocitária e culturas para aeróbios, anaeróbios e fungos. RESULTADOS: Nos pacientes com RSC foram cultivados 220 microorganismos, dentre os quais os mais freqüentes foram o Staphylococcus aureus, presente em 31% das amostras, e o Staphylococcus coagulase-negativo (SCN) em 23%. Gram-negativos ou facultativos foram isolados em 37% das amostras, anaeróbios em 12%, e fungos em 14%. Ao exame bacterioscópico evidenciou-se alguns ou numerosos leucócitos em 74% das amostras com culturas positivas. Nos indivíduos sadios o SCN foi isolado em 40% das amostras e o Staphylococcus aureus em 18%. Em 12% dos indivíduos a cultura para fungos foi positiva, e o exame direto negativo. Todas as culturas anaeróbias foram estéreis. Quanto à contagem leucocitária todos apresentaram nenhum ou raros leucócitos. CONCLUSÃO: Os grupos apresentaram resultados semelhantes quanto à microbiologia, entretanto, diferiram em relação à contagem leucocitária, o que auxilia na diferenciação um microorganismo infectante de um colonizante.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Observational | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Observational | low |
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".