Modelling IrSC: proposal options and performance analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Proposed by IrDA, the Infrared Simple Connection (IrSC) protocol is a protocol dedicated for fast connection and instant data transmission over point-to-point infrared links. Although the protocol is still under development, it has attracted considerable attention from both manufacturers and researchers. The IrDA special interest group proposed two different technical approaches to address the requirements of IrSC. In this paper, technical approach 1 (IrSC1) and approach 2 (IrSC2) are modelled. Subsequently, the performance of IrSC1 and IrSC2 is compared. Additionally, the performance of unchanged IrDA Standard (IrDAS) is compared with both approaches. The contribution of this work is to clarify the issues for designing IrSC, and compare IrSC1 and IrSC2, in addition to providing suitable design guidelines for IrDA devices for high performance of IrSC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it