Learning sparse dictionary for long-term biomedical signal classification and clustering
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Long-term observational biomedical signals are often used for many medical diagnoses including sleep disorder and epilepsy. Effective management and usage of this type of data through classification or clustering problem is the key to real-world applications. This work focuses on learning a se of selected sparse basis functions, called a double-sparse dictionary, directly from specific data, in order to produce a collection of discriminative features with low variability. Our approach is to combine wavelet transform with sparse principal component analysis (SPCA), namely wavelet sparse PCA (WSPCA), and apply it to a signal segment matrix. The application of this proposed method is demonstrated by classification and clustering problems of long-term EEG signals, and the results are compared to other PCA-based sparse methods. The nearly perfect classification accuracy (i.e., 99.7%) is obtained by using WSPCA for the data we consider. Although PCA leads to the best performance among all methods we considered, WSPCA does not lose classification accuracy significantly and it is more suitable for long-term signal classification due to the time-domain signal dimension reduction by wavelets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it