MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034067888 · doi:10.1109/isspa.2012.6310458

Learning sparse dictionary for long-term biomedical signal classification and clustering

2012· article· en· W2034067888 on OpenAlexaff
Shengkun Xie, Sridhar Krishnan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPattern recognition (psychology)Cluster analysisComputer scienceWaveletArtificial intelligenceSparse approximationPrincipal component analysisDiscriminative modelDimensionality reductionTerm (time)Sparse PCAK-SVDSparse matrixSIGNAL (programming language)Machine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Long-term observational biomedical signals are often used for many medical diagnoses including sleep disorder and epilepsy. Effective management and usage of this type of data through classification or clustering problem is the key to real-world applications. This work focuses on learning a se of selected sparse basis functions, called a double-sparse dictionary, directly from specific data, in order to produce a collection of discriminative features with low variability. Our approach is to combine wavelet transform with sparse principal component analysis (SPCA), namely wavelet sparse PCA (WSPCA), and apply it to a signal segment matrix. The application of this proposed method is demonstrated by classification and clustering problems of long-term EEG signals, and the results are compared to other PCA-based sparse methods. The nearly perfect classification accuracy (i.e., 99.7%) is obtained by using WSPCA for the data we consider. Although PCA leads to the best performance among all methods we considered, WSPCA does not lose classification accuracy significantly and it is more suitable for long-term signal classification due to the time-domain signal dimension reduction by wavelets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207