MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034079820 · doi:10.1300/j114v18n02_02

Canadian Emergency Preparedness Initiatives

2003· article· en· W2034079820 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lyn Guerin

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary & Archival Security · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicConservation Techniques and Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Museums Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreparednessPlan (archaeology)Cultural propertyPublic administrationPolitical scienceCultural heritageNational heritageDisaster preparednessEmergency managementLibrary sciencePublic relationsBusinessEngineeringLawGeographyArchaeologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Representatives of Canada's major museum, archives, library, and conservation associations, working with federal heritage agencies, have endorsed a plan to establish a Culture Property Protection Program (CPP). This program would see the development of a consistent and effective national emergency preparedness capability for cultural institutions, including provisions for aid to other countries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.593

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0160.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0030.006
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0770.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary & Archival SecuritySame topicConservation Techniques and StudiesFrench-language works237,207