MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034111115 · doi:10.1145/2641798.2641815

Towards mobility-aware predictive radio access

2014· article· en· W2034111115 on OpenAlexaff
Hatem Abou-Zeid, Hossam S. Hassanein, Ramy Atawia

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceLeverage (statistics)Radio access networkQuality of serviceRadio resource managementEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionComputer networkCellular networkResource allocationQuality of experienceDistributed computingBase stationWireless networkTelecommunicationsWirelessMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Novel radio access techniques that leverage mobility predictions are receiving increasing interest in recent literature. The essence of these schemes is to lookahead at the future rates users will experience, and then devise long-term resource allocation strategies. For instance, a YouTube video user moving towards the cell edge can be prioritized to pre-buffer additional video content before poor coverage commences. While the potential of mobility-aware resource allocation has recently been demonstrated, several practical design aspects and evaluation approaches have not yet been addressed due to the complexity of the problem. Furthermore, since prior works have focused on specific applications there is also a strong need for a unified framework that can support different user and network requirements. For this purpose, we present a novel two-stage Predictive Radio Access Network (P-RAN) framework that can efficiently leverage both future data rate predictions in the order of tens of seconds, and instantaneous fast fading at the millisecond level. We also show how the framework can be implemented within the open source Network Simulator 3 (ns-3) LTE module, and apply it to optimize stored video delivery. A thorough set of performance tests are then conducted to assess the performance gains and investigate sensitivity to various prediction errors. Our results indicate that P-RANs can jointly improve both service quality and transmission efficiency. Additionally, we also observe that P-RAN performance can be further improved by modeling prediction uncertainty and developing robust allocation techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207