Parents Who Sue Their Adult Children For Support: An Examination of Decisions by Canadian Court Judges
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RÉSUMÉ Ce document explore les facteurs pris en compte par des juges de cours canadiennes dans 14 causes où la loi provinciale a obligé des enfants adultes à prendre leurs parents en charge. L'exploration se situe dans un contexte de relations intergénérationnelles et porte plus précisément sur l'échange entre parents et enfants adultes. L'analyse a révélé que les cours prônent l'obligation pour les membres d'une même famille de subvenir aux besoins les uns des autres aux termes de la loi et que cette responsabilité repose sur certaines priorités. Les obligations de la famille nucléaire ont préséance sur celles de la famille élargie. Le document se penche sur trois facteurs pris en compte par la cour: l'admissibilité du parent, l'identité de l'initiateur de la poursuite et enfin, la définition et la priorisation des responsabilités entre les parents et les enfants adultes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".