MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034130105 · doi:10.1063/1.1388184

Ferroelectric order in positionally frozen dipolar systems

2001· article· en· W2034130105 on OpenAlexaff
Sabine H. L. Klapp, G. N. Patey

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCharacterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDipoleFerroelectricityCondensed matter physicsHard spheresAmorphous solidChemistryPhysicsThermodynamicsQuantum mechanicsDielectricCrystallography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We discuss the possibility of long-range ferroelectric order in an amorphous dipolar system. Our model consists of spheres with frozen positions and freely rotating three-dimensional dipole moments. Correlation functions are calculated by means of the hypernetted-chain integral theory combined with the replica method. Our results suggest that inhomogeneities in the frozen spatial structure induce a gradual local freezing of the dipole axes upon decreasing temperature. However, at sufficiently high densities and dipole moments, the long-range interactions dominate the short-range frustration, resulting in a ferroelectric transition. The estimated transition temperatures depend strongly on the degree of spatial correlation in the underlying system of frozen spheres. For a randomly frozen system, we find that the transition temperature is considerably lower than that predicted by mean field theory, and also lower than the temperature where simulations indicate the onset of glass-like behavior. Strong positional correlations can push the transition toward temperatures higher even than those observed for dipolar fluids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicCharacterization and Applications of Magnetic NanoparticlesFrench-language works237,207