MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034142697 · doi:10.3905/jfi.2005.523092

Credit Default Swaptions

2005· article· en· W2034142697 on OpenAlexaff
Alan L. Tucker, Jason Zhanshun Wei

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Fixed Income · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCredit Risk and Financial Regulations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNotional amountCredit default swapCredit derivativeCollateralized debt obligationiTraxxBusinessInterest rate swapEconomicsSwap (finance)Actuarial scienceCredit valuation adjustmentCredit riskFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The credit derivatives market, widely regarded as the fastest growing sector of the derivatives industry, is estimated at over $5 trillion in average outstanding notional principal worldwide. Credit default swaps account for approximately 73% of the market. Options on credit default swaps—known as CDS swaptions—have recently become popular among end users. CDS swaptions come in two general varieties: calls and puts written on CDS, and cancelable CDS. A cancelable CDS includes an embedded option to terminate a CDS contract (an embedded CDS swaption). The authors describe credit default swaptions and their uses in creating synthetic collateralized debt obligations, and illustrate accessible valuation models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.662
Threshold uncertainty score0.617

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Fixed IncomeSame topicCredit Risk and Financial RegulationsFrench-language works237,207