MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Exit‐site and catheter‐related infections in peritoneal dialysis: Problems and progress

2000· article· en· W2034145824 on OpenAlexaff
Mrinal Dasgupta

Bibliographic record

VenueNephrology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePeritoneal dialysisCatheterSilasticPeritonitisSurgeryExit siteStaphylococcus aureusIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY: Silastic peritoneal catheters are used routinely for peritoneal access in peritoneal dialysis (PD) because they are biocompatible. Catheter insertions are usually succeeded by bacterial adhesion and subsequent colonization of the catheter exit site. Despite the reduction in the proportion of peritonitis due to touch contamination, exit‐site and catheter‐related infections, particularly those caused by Staphylococcus aureus, remain the major cause of catheter loss and technique failure in PD. The peritonitis rate in the global PD population is steadily declining, but as the number of patients on PD increases by about 10% per year the stakes in infection control become greater, and one is forced to consider new options that will reduce the PD patient drop‐out rate. Three areas of promising advances in the prevention of exit‐site and catheter‐related infections are reviewed in this paper: (i) the use of prophylactic antibiotics to eliminate the nasal carriage of Staph. aureus and to reduce exit‐site infections; (ii) the Moncrief–Popovich catheter and implantation technique which reduces bacterial colonization of the catheter exit tunnel; (iii) new catheter implants composed in part of rigid biomaterials with antibacterial properties. This last category includes the silver‐coated silastic PD catheter, significant not only because it has great potential as a replacement for the silastic catheter, but also because it is a reminder that caution must be exercised before fully embracing new treatment options.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.006
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNephrologySame topicCentral Venous Catheters and HemodialysisFrench-language works237,207