MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034161055 · doi:10.1038/ajg.2012.61

Editorial: Irritable Bowel Syndrome and the Elusive Mast Cells

2012· editorial· en· W2034161055 on OpenAlexafffund
Theoharis C. Theoharides, Shahrzad Asadi, Ji‐Hong Chen, Jan D. Huizinga

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2012
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal motility and disorders
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityPopulation Health Research Institute
FundersNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin DiseasesNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsIrritable bowel syndromeMedicineMast cellImmune systemImmune dysregulationGastroenterologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is the most common condition seen by gastroenterologists. It presents with alternating symptoms of bowel dysfunction that often worsens with stress. The cause of these symptoms eludes investigators and many attempts have been made to discover an underlying pathology. This is a daunting task since symptoms come and go, and change characteristics. Furthermore, the pathology of IBS is unlikely to be identical in all patients. In addition, all symptoms and all features studied thus far have a strong overlap with healthy volunteers. Elsewhere in this issue, Braak et al. report a well-designed clinical investigation in patients with IBS and come to the conclusion that IBS is not characterized by mast cell or other immune cell proliferation, but by immune dysregulation in the colon. Is this the final answer?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0150.018
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of GastroenterologySame topicGastrointestinal motility and disordersFrench-language works237,207