MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034168746 · doi:10.3828/bjcs.20.2.6

'Mère, je vous hais!': Quebec Nationalism and the Legacy of the Family Paradigm in Pierre Vallières' <i>Nègres blancs d'Amérique</i>

2007· article· fr· W2034168746 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Katherine A. Roberts

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Canadian Studies · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNationalismSecularizationPoliticsScrutinyCitizenshipRhetoricModernization theoryGender studiesSociologyReligious studiesHistoryPolitical scienceMedia studiesLawTheologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The gendered rhetoric of Quebec modern nationalism has come under recent scrutiny by political scientists who have questioned its equation of citizenship with a masculine universal (Lamoureux 2001). At the heart of this discourse of liberation is the desire on the part of the Quebecois national subject, figured as castrated by Anglo-Canadian political and cultural domination, to leave the posture du fils (within a female-dominated single-parent family) and become a fully-fledged father-citizen. Central to this revolt is the rejection of the mother whose perceived close association with the church at a time of rapid modernisation and secularisation in Quebec society resulted in her embodying retrograde rural and religious values. This article traces the obsession with and denigration of the maternal figure in a key essay of the Quiet Revolution period: Pierre Vallieres' Negres blancs d'Amerique (1969). I call attention to the author's naturalisation of the public and private spheres and his inability to co...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.705

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0250.018
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of Canadian StudiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207