MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034206299 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m110686200

The Fission Yeast ES2 Homologue, Bis1, Interacts with the Ish1 Stress-responsive Nuclear Envelope Protein

2002· article· en· W2034206299 on OpenAlexafffund
Lorena Taricani, Max L. Tejada, Paul G. Young

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicFungal and yeast genetics research
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiologyTranscription factorCell biologySaccharomyces cerevisiaeSchizosaccharomyces pombeCell cycleNuclear proteinOsmotic shockYeastGeneticsCellGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In fission yeast, nutrient starvation induces physiological, biochemical, and morphological changes that enable survival. Collectively these changes are referred to as stationary phase. We have used a green fluorescent protein random insertional mutagenesis system to isolate two novel stress-response proteins required in stationary phase. Ish1 is a nuclear envelope protein that is present throughout the cell cycle and whose expression is increased in response to stresses such as glucose and nitrogen starvation, as well as osmotic stress. Expression of Ish1 is regulated by the Spc1 MAPK pathway through the Atf1 transcription factor. Although overexpression of Ish1 is lethal, cells lacking ish1 exhibit reduced viability in stationary phase. Bis1 is a novel interacting partner of Ish1. Bis1 is the Schizosaccharomyces pombe member of the ES2 nuclear protein family found in Mus musculus, Drosophila melanogaster, Homo sapiens, and Arabidopsis thaliana. Overexpression of Bis1 results in a cell elongation phenotype, whereas bis1(-) cells exhibit a reduced viability in stationary phase similar to that seen in ish1(-) cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicFungal and yeast genetics researchFrench-language works237,207