Impaired Efficiency of Functional Networks Underlying Episodic Memory-for-Context in Schizophrenia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Memory for context and episodic memory have been identified as primary contributors to cognitive impairments in schizophrenia. This study examined neural networks involved in episodic memory-for-context in schizophrenia using a multimodal strategy including a graph theoretical approach, combined with an assessment of the contribution of structural impairments to disruption in the efficiency of functional brain networks. Twenty-three patients with schizophrenia and 33 healthy controls performed an episodic memory-for-context task while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging scanning. Graph theory was used to characterize the small-world properties of functional connections between activated regions, and a morphometric analysis was used to investigate schizophrenia-related structural deficits. Similar functional activations were identified in the two groups; however, although small-world properties were present in the topological organization of the functional networks in both groups, significant reductions in local, but not global, efficiency were observed in the schizophrenia group. Several key network "hub" regions related to recollection, such as the bilateral dorsal anterior cingulate gyrus, showed reduced gray matter volume in schizophrenia patients. These findings suggest that loss of gray matter volume may contribute to local inefficiencies in the architecture of the network underlying memory-for-context in schizophrenia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".