MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034211421 · doi:10.1021/ie0505559

Synthesis of Hydrated Aluminum Phosphate, AlPO<sub>4</sub>·1.5H<sub>2</sub>O (AlPO<sub>4</sub>−H<sub>3</sub>), by Controlled Reactive Crystallization in Sulfate Media

2005· article· en· W2034211421 on OpenAlexafffund
F. Lagno, George P. Demopoulos

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicZeolite Catalysis and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsSupersaturationCrystallizationPrecipitationCrystallitePhosphateParticle sizeSulfateMetastabilityMaterials scienceAluminiumChemical engineeringMineralogyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryChromatographyPhysical chemistryMetallurgyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new method for the synthesis of hydrated aluminum phosphate, AlPO 4 ·1.5H 2 O, in a semibatch reactor is reported. The synthesis involves direct reactive crystallization induced by pH adjustment to a predetermined supersaturation level. Precipitation was conducted in sulfate-based solutions with Al(III):P(V) molar ratio of 1 and at 95 °C. Homogeneous precipitation tests led to the definition of the metastable zone of aluminum phosphate. This zone was used to design the supersaturation-controlled seeded test. XRD, TGA, and chemical analysis confirmed the product to be AlPO 4 ·1.5H 2 O. SEM and particle size analysis revealed the product to consist of aggregates of submicron-size crystallites of 3.5 μm average size (homogeneously formed product) grown to 16.5 μm after three cycles of seeded crystallization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicZeolite Catalysis and SynthesisFrench-language works237,207