<b>Ovarian reserve following uterine artery embolization in women of reproductive age: A preliminary report</b>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of uterine artery embolization (UAE) for leiomyomata on reproductive potential for women in their reproductive age group. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This non-randomized, cross-sectional, observational study of ovarian reserve in women under 40 years of age who underwent UAE was conducted at a private practice located in Los Angeles, California. Twenty four women under 40 years of age who underwent UAE at least four months prior to study interventions were recruited. The study involved a one-time serum blood test on day three of the menstrual cycle and measured early follicular phrase follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and estradiol (E2) levels. RESULTS: Descriptive analysis showed means of all outcome measures were within normal range of values [FSH = 6.67IU/L (SD = 2.3), AMH = 1.24 ng/ml (SD = 0.9), E2 = 58.8 pg/ml (SD = 18.0)]. CONCLUSION: Hormonal findings from this study were within normal ranges, suggesting that ovarian function is not adversely affected by UAE. Women with fibroids within reproductive age may consider UAE as a treatment option.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".