MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034218369 · doi:10.3109/13645706.2012.743918

<b>Ovarian reserve following uterine artery embolization in women of reproductive age: A preliminary report</b>

2013· article· en· W2034218369 on OpenAlexaff
Bruce McLucas, H. Danzer, C.M. Wambach, Charlotte Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueMinimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUterine Myomas and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUtah Agricultural Experiment Station
KeywordsUterine artery embolizationOvarian reserveMedicineEmbolizationOvarian arteryGynecologyUterine arteryRadiologyBiologyPregnancyInfertility

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of uterine artery embolization (UAE) for leiomyomata on reproductive potential for women in their reproductive age group. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This non-randomized, cross-sectional, observational study of ovarian reserve in women under 40 years of age who underwent UAE was conducted at a private practice located in Los Angeles, California. Twenty four women under 40 years of age who underwent UAE at least four months prior to study interventions were recruited. The study involved a one-time serum blood test on day three of the menstrual cycle and measured early follicular phrase follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and estradiol (E2) levels. RESULTS: Descriptive analysis showed means of all outcome measures were within normal range of values [FSH = 6.67IU/L (SD = 2.3), AMH = 1.24 ng/ml (SD = 0.9), E2 = 58.8 pg/ml (SD = 18.0)]. CONCLUSION: Hormonal findings from this study were within normal ranges, suggesting that ovarian function is not adversely affected by UAE. Women with fibroids within reproductive age may consider UAE as a treatment option.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.487
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMinimally Invasive Therapy & Allied TechnologiesSame topicUterine Myomas and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207