Evaluation of an affection, love and sex education program for people with moderate intellectual disabilities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction The Programme d’éducation à la vie affective, amoureuse et sexuelle (ÉVAAS), an affection, love and sex education program for people with moderate intellectual disabilities (Desaulniers, Boucher, Boutet, & Voyer, 2001), is widely used in Quebec and is applied in several locations in Belgium, France and Switzerland. Objectives An implementation evaluation was recently completed as the first stage of a program evaluation. Aims The aim of the project was to establish the value of this program. Methods For the purpose, 73 ÉVAAS sessions at five different sites were observed and questionnaires and interviews with 10 group leaders and their supervisors were analyzed. Results It was found above all that the program was normally implemented in accordance with its spirit and objectives. However, it was also noted that follow-up to interventions carried out during ÉVAAS sessions was much less structured and sustained, particularly as regards those intended for friends and family. Conclusions The research team formulated seven recommendations regarding the program's implementation framework and adjustments required to ensure the achievement of its objectives. The recommendations concern the authors of the program, the educators who use it, their supervisors, as well as service managers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".