MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034243092 · doi:10.3148/63.1.2002.20

<i>Insulin Resistance:</i> Concepts, Controversies, and the Role of Nutrition

2002· review· en· W2034243092 on OpenAlexaffvenue
John L. Sievenpiper, Alexandra L. Jenkins, Dana Whitham, Vladimir Vuksan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet and metabolism studies
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInsulin resistanceInsulinDiabetes mellitusEndocrinologyMedicineInternal medicineObesity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Insulin resistance is a prevalent condition, in which insulin loses its normal physiological action. Since people were first classified as insulin resistant over 60 years ago, one of the main discoveries has been that insulin resistance clusters with other risk factors such as obesity, elevated triglycerides, and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, increasing cardiovascular disease risk. Although insulin resistance appears to manifest first in the periphery and then in the liver, other sites, such as the brain and the pancreatic &b.beta-cell, may play pathogenic roles. Factors contributing to insulin resistance at these sites include perturbations in free fatty acids, glucose, and hormone-signalling, some of which may be linked to various genetic polymorphisms. Appropriate nutritional treatment for insulin resistance is controversial. Two main approaches are drawn from diabetes recommendations: i) a high-carbohydrate, low-fat, high-fibre diet emphasizing low glycemic-index foods and ii) sharing calories between monounsaturated fat and complex carbohydrate at the expense of saturated fat. Recent interest in insulin resistance has prompted the development of new guidelines. Promising data have also emerged, showing that a high-carbohydrate, high-fibre, low-fat diet plus exercise programs maintained through intensive counselling can decrease diabetes risk by over 40%. Additional research is required to confirm the sustainability of this approach and sort out the determinants of insulin resistance so that more effective nutritional interventions will result.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and ResearchSame topicDiet and metabolism studiesFrench-language works237,207