Coordinated observations of Pc3 pulsations near cusp latitudes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In spite of accumulated observations of ULF pulsations, there are no satisfactory explanations for the generation and transmission mechanisms of Pc3 pulsations at very high latitudes. We studied the characteristics of the high‐latitude Pc3 pulsations by using data acquired on the ground by magnetometer arrays, in the ionosphere by the Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN) of HF radars, and in space by the Geotail satellite. The observations revealed that narrowband Pc3 pulsations are occasionally observed simultaneously in magnetic field data on the ground and in Doppler velocity data acquired by the HF radars in the intervals of small interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) cone angles. We find that there is a clear peak of the Pc3 power near the cusp latitudes and that the power of pulsations decreases very steeply with latitude. At times, there are periods of high coherence between the pulsations in the dawn magnetosheath and on the ground, although the spectra of the magnetosheath magnetic field variations exhibit broadband signatures. The Poynting flux in the Pc3 band increases in the magnetosheath when narrowband Pc3 pulsations are observed in the cusp region. The results suggest that the driving source is located in the magnetosheath and that part of the MHD energy in the magnetosheath propagates to the ionospheric cusp. We suggest that the transmission of Pc3 pulsations in the cusp region requires not only a non‐MHD mechanism as suggested (e.g., modulated precipitation of trapped electrons) but also an MHD wave incident into the ionosphere.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".