Bibliographic record
Abstract
Entre mai 1856 et mars 1858, un foisonnement d’études inédites paraissent sur Honoré de Balzac qui s’écartent de la tradition des témoignages et des critiques biographiques — celle des contemporains qui ont côtoyé le grand homme disparu et se grandissent en disant qu’ils l’ont bien connu. Si l’on peut affirmer qu’une révolution s’est opérée en août 1850 sur la tombe de Balzac qui affecte les appropriations de son oeuvre autant que le discours global sur le genre romanesque et sur son ennoblissement, on peut ajouter que la mêlée des discours qui s’appliquent à l’auteur de La comédie humaine sept ans plus tard, tandis que Flaubert et Baudelaire sont poursuivis pour outrage à la morale publique et à la religion, permet de réarticuler les tensions entre romantisme, réalisme et naturalisme, et entre romantisme et modernité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".