Regional patterns in periphyton accrual and diatom assemblage structure in a heterogeneous nutrient landscape
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of nutrient regime on periphyton community development in large rivers was examined (sites ranged from oligotrophic to eutrophic). Patterns in diatom community structure were examined at a large spatial scale (ultimate), whereas at the microhabitat scale (proximate), artificial nutrient-diffusing substrata were used to examine periphyton response to amendment with nitrogen, phosphorus, and N + P. Ratios of ambient dissolved inorganic nitrogen to total phosphorus were used to make predictions of nutrient limitation (molar total inorganic nitrogen (TIN) : total phosphorus (TP)), which matched experimental results in 8 of 12 sites. Two sites with highest ambient nutrient levels (mean NO 3 + NO 2 and TP, 1.49 and 0.081 mg·L 1 , respectively) possessed the highest diatom richness and diversity (mean richness = 42). Lowest diatom taxa richness (19) occurred in an impounded system with low TP (0.008 mg·L 1 ). Principal components analysis (PCA) of diatom taxa structure among sites (control treatments only) and small-scale patterns among nutrient treatments using all sites and treatments combined indicated that sites were grouped according to drainage basin (r 2 = 0.79) and that there was no unified response to enrichment (r 2 = 0.43). Results suggest that large spatial scale factors are more important in determining the potential benthic diatom assemblage than small-scale, proximate variables provided by the diffusers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".