Bibliographic record
Abstract
Linear stability of Couette flow modified by transpiration applied at the lower wall is considered. It is shown that transpiration can induce flow instability resulting in the appearance of streamwise-vortex-like structures. It is argued that the instability is driven by centrifugal forces associated with streamline curvature. The conditions leading to the onset of the instability depend on the amplitude and wavelength of the transpiration and can be expressed in terms of the critical Reynolds number. The global critical conditions describing the minimum critical Reynolds number required for the onset of the instability for the specified amplitude of the transpiration regardless of its wavelength are also given. The threshold amplitude required for the onset varies approximately as ${\sim}\hbox{\it Re}^{-1.15}$ for large $Re$ , where the Reynolds number used is based on the velocity difference between the walls and the channel half-width. The existence of a global threshold, below which the instability cannot occur regardless of the amplitude of the transpiration, has been demonstrated. This threshold corresponds approximately to $\hbox{\it Re}=84$ .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".