MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034338124 · doi:10.1049/mnl.2012.0587

Aluminium nitride/nanodiamond structures for high-frequency surface acoustic wave nanotransducers

2012· article· en· W2034338124 on OpenAlexaff
Ali B. Alamin Dow, Abdelaziz Yousif Ahmed, Cyril Popov, U. Schmid, Nazir P. Kherani

Bibliographic record

VenueMicro & Nano Letters · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetal and Thin Film Mechanics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceSurface acoustic waveTransducerAluminium nitrideNitrideOptoelectronicsLithographyNanodiamondDiamondAmorphous solidLayer (electronics)AluminiumAcousticsNanotechnologyComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Surface acoustic waves (SAWs) have been used extensively for a variety of applications such as telecommunications, electronic devices and sensors. The emerging need for high-bit data processing at GHz frequencies and the requirement of high-sensitivity sensors demand the development of high-efficiency SAW devices. With the objective of exploiting the high acoustic velocity of diamond, the authors report on an optimally developed nanodiamond (ND) thin film with crystal size of 3–5 nm, embedded in an amorphous carbon matrix with grain boundaries of 1–1.5 nm, that is integrated with aluminium nitride (AlN) to extend the operating frequency of SAW transducers. The authors utilise this attractive property of diamond through facile synthesis of a bi-layer structure consisting of sputtered AlN deposited on ND. Deposition of ND was carried out using microwave plasma-enhanced chemical vapour deposition. AlN/ND-based SAW structures were fabricated using electron beam lithography to produce high acoustic velocity transducers. The fabricated SAW transducers were composed of two spatial periods of 1400 and 3200 nm devices. The fabricated devices exhibit an operating frequency of >2 GHz with an acoustic velocity of 8120 and 9280 m/s, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicro & Nano LettersSame topicMetal and Thin Film MechanicsFrench-language works237,207