Enhanced Dynamic EMG-Force Estimation Through Calibration and PCI Modeling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To accurately estimate muscle forces using electromyogram (EMG) signals, precise EMG amplitude estimation, and a modeling scheme capable of coping with the nonlinearities and dynamics of the EMG-force relationship are needed. In this work, angle-based EMG amplitude calibration and parallel cascade identification (PCI) modeling are combined for EMG-based force estimation in dynamic contractions, including concentric and eccentric contractions of the biceps brachii and triceps brachii muscles. Angle-based calibration has been shown to improve surface EMG (SEMG) based force estimation during isometric contractions through minimization of the effects of joint angle related factors, and PCI modeling captures both the nonlinear and dynamic properties of the process. SEMG data recorded during constant force, constant velocity, and varying force, varying velocity flexion and extension trials are calibrated. The calibration values are obtained at specific elbow joint angles and interpolated to cover a continuous range of joint angles. The calibrated data are used in PCI models to estimate the force induced at the wrist. The experimental results show the effectiveness of the calibration scheme, combined with PCI modeling. For the constant force, constant velocity trials, minimum %RMSE of 8.3% is achieved for concentric contractions, 10.3% for eccentric contractions and 33.3% for fully dynamic contractions. Force estimation accuracy is superior in concentric contractions in comparison to eccentric contractions , which may be indicative of more nonlinearity in the eccentric SEMG-force relationship.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".