Physical Parameters of Erupting Luminous Blue Variables: NGC 2363‐V1 Caught in the Act
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A quantitative study of the luminous blue variable NGC 2363-V1 in the Magellanic galaxy NGC 2366 ( D = 3.44 Mpc) is presented, based on ultraviolet and optical Hubble Space Telescope STIS spectroscopy. Contemporary WFPC2 and William Herschel Telescope imaging reveals a modest V -band brightness increase of ~0.2 mag per year between 1996 January-1997 November, reaching V = 17.4 mag, corresponding to M V = -10.4 mag. Subsequently, V1 underwent a similar decrease in V -band brightness, together with a UV brightening of 0.35 mag from 1997 November to 1999 November. The optical spectrum of V1 is dominated by H emission lines, with Fe II, He I and Na I also detected. In the ultraviolet, a forest of Fe absorption features and numerous absorption lines typical of mid-B supergiants (such as Si II, Si III, Si IV, C III, C IV) are observed. From a spectral analysis with the non-LTE, line-blanketed code of Hillier & Miller, we derive stellar parameters of T * = 11 kK, R * = 420 R ☉ , log ( L / L ☉ ) = 6.35 during 1997 November, and T * = 13 kK, R * = 315 R ☉ , log ( L / L ☉ ) = 6.4 for 1999 July. The wind properties of V1 are also exceptional, with ≃ 4.4 × 10 -4 M ☉ yr -1 and v ∞ ≃ 300 km s -1 , allowing for a clumped wind (filling factor = 0.3) and assuming H/He ~ 4 by number. The presence of Fe lines in the UV and optical spectrum of V1 permits an estimate of the heavy elemental abundance of NGC 2363 from our spectral synthesis. Although some deficiencies remain, allowance for charge exchange reactions in our calculations supports a SMC-like metallicity, that has previously been determined for NGC 2363 from nebular oxygen diagnostics. Considering a variety of possible progenitor stars, V1 has definitely undergone a giant eruption, with a substantial increase in stellar luminosity, radius, and almost certainly mass-loss rate, such that its stellar radius increased at an average rate of ~4 km s -1 during 1992 October-1995 February. The stellar properties of V1 are compared to other LBVs, including η Car and HD 5980 during its brief eruption in 1994 September, the latter newly analyzed here. The mass-loss rate of the HD 5980 eruptor compares closely with V1, but its bolometric luminosity was a factor ~6 times larger.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".