MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034376417 · doi:10.1063/1.1502645

Computer simulations of the dynamics of doubly occupied N2 clathrate hydrates

2002· article· en· W2034376417 on OpenAlexaff
E. P. van Klaveren, J. P. J. Michels, J. A. Schouten, D. D. Klug, John S. Tse

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsSteacie Institute for Molecular Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClathrate hydrateIntermolecular forceMoleculeChemistryPhononMolecular physicsMolecular dynamicsMolecular vibrationLattice (music)Chemical physicsRange (aeronautics)CrystallographyCondensed matter physicsComputational chemistryHydratePhysicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have studied the dynamical properties of doubly and singly occupied structure II N2 clathrate hydrates by performing a series of classical molecular dynamics calculations. The intermolecular vibrational density of states of the guest molecules show the most explicit changes when going from single to double occupancies. Instead of the narrow peak for single occupancy (at 20 cm−1), a broad range of frequencies occurs between 0 and 200 cm−1 with four modes, which have been assigned to the possible vibrations in the cage. This spectrum provides a unique fingerprint of double occupancy. For the host lattice, the libron band and the optic phonon branch show lower frequencies as compared to single fillings. In contrast, the acoustic phonon branch shifts to lower frequencies for a single filling of the large cases. We find that there is a large vibrational guest–host coupling for both single and double occupancies, although the frequency range is broader in the latter case. There is a significant translational diffusion of the N2 molecules in the doubly occupied cages. Occasionally both molecules simultaneously migrate from one local energy minimum to another. An orientational order of the N2 molecules occurs only within the small cages. However, the relative orientation of the two molecules in the doubly occupied cages is preserved in time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicMethane Hydrates and Related PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207