MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034402741 · doi:10.1063/1.1823778

Formation of glass fiber tips for scanning near-field optical microscopy by sealed- and open-tube etching

2004· article· en· W2034402741 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of Scientific Instruments · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNear-Field Optical Microscopy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEtching (microfabrication)Materials scienceHydrofluoric acidTube (container)Optical microscopeIsotropic etchingOptical fiberOpticsReactive-ion etchingFiberComposite materialDry etchingGlass fiberScanning electron microscopeOptoelectronicsMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A method, sealed-tube etching, for fabricating glass fiber tips used in scanning near-field optical microscopy is reported. Two glass tips are formed simultaneously inside the acrylate jacket of an optical fiber that is sealed at the bottom end with plastic prior to etching in hydrofluoric acid. The qualities of the tips generated from this and conventional tube etching methods are compared in terms of their taper length, surface smoothness, as well as time evolution of the tip shapes. Etching mechanisms are proposed for this method, which provides more insight into the conventional tube etching method than previously considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.282
Threshold uncertainty score0.571

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it