MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2034415571 · doi:10.1177/0883073810390213

Electroretinogram Changes in a Pediatric Population With Epilepsy: Is Vigabatrin Acting Alone?

2011· article· en· W2034415571 on OpenAlexafffund
Bláthnaid McCoy, Tom Wright, Shelly K. Weiss, Cristina Go, Carol A. Westall

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Child Neurology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsVigabatrinMedicineEpilepsyToxicityDoseAntiepileptic drugPopulationAnesthesiaPharmacologyAnticonvulsantPediatricsInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vigabatrin, a structural analogue of the inhibitory neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), is widely used as initial monotherapy in infantile spasms and add on therapy in partial onset seizures. Vigabatrin is associated with retinal toxicity causing constriction of the visual field. Our aim was to assess what effect add-on antiepileptic drug therapy has on the incidence of retinal toxicity in patients being treated with vigabatrin. Medication dosages, duration of treatment, and electroretinogram results were examined in a single center retrospective study. Retinal toxicity was detected in 18 of 160 patients (11.25%) over a 10-year period. A total of 14 (77%) were in the group treated with additional antiepileptic drugs, the other 4 received vigabatrin as monotherapy. We detected a significantly higher percentage of toxicity in the group of patients treated with vigabatrin and additional antiepileptic drugs. Our numbers were not sufficient to detect which drug or combination of drugs might be associated with higher risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Child NeurologySame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207